Acadēmīa Latīnitātis - User contributions [en]

Acadēmīa:Fabrica

2023-04-23T23:12:22Z

Lūkās: /* Dandelion */ Reply

{{Fabrica}}
{{Archives}}

__NEWSECTIONLINK__

== Dandelion ==

{{Proposal}}dēns liōnis

{{Reason}}According to Wiktionary, the term "dēns liōnis" is attested in Late Latin, but I cannot find any evidence for that. Maybe @[[User:Lukas|Lukas]] or @[[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]] can help me with that to find a source. [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 20:05, 3 March 2023 (CET)

:[https://mateo.uni-mannheim.de/camenaref/kirsch/kirsch1/p1/jpg/s0422.html Kirsch] does have ''Dens leonis'' as ''Löwenzahn, ein Kraut'' (Dandelion, an herb). [[User:Lūkās|Lūkās]] ([[User talk:Lūkās|talk]]) 23:14, 3 March 2023 (CET)
::Thanks. You could make the entry, if you want. [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 23:29, 3 March 2023 (CET)
:::Why ''dēns leōnis'' and not ''taraxacum (vulgāre)'' or ''aphaca''?
:::> Varium adeptum est nomen Taraxacum. A foliorum incisuris dentatis vel pinnatis, maxillam dentatam leonis referre creditis, vel quia dentibus lacerata videntur, dens leonis, dent de lion Gallis, loewenzahn, a thalamo nudo punctato, rasum caput referente, caput monachi vocatum est. A singulari virtute, urinaria et pisse en lit, ab eadem, et a scapo cavo fistularia...
:::https://books.google.it/books?id=NeZSAAAAcAAJ '''De taraxaco praesertim aquae eiusdem per fermentationem paratae eximio usu''' one of the first result of dens leonis in google books [[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]] ([[User talk:Logodaedalus|talk]]) 11:36, 4 March 2023 (CET)
::::It is the botanical name, which we could also include. But I have personally a problem with that, since botanical names are usually artificial and do not fit that well with Latin. [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 14:34, 4 March 2023 (CET)
:::::I agree that botanical names are oftentimes artificial. But overall I disagree because (1) taraxacum is just a part of the botanical name (2) I put in my previous reply a source which attests the use of taraxacum as the name of the plant and other names like dens leonis, caput monachi and urinaria (it. pisciacane). [[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]] ([[User talk:Logodaedalus|talk]]) 14:44, 4 March 2023 (CET)
::::::[https://mateo.uni-mannheim.de/camenaref/kirsch/kirsch1/p1/jpg/s1400.html Kirsch] also has an entry for ''Tărāxăcum, i, n.'' and defines it as "<span lang="de" dir="ltr">Pfaffenblatt, Münchskopf, Saudistel, ein gewisses Kraut. ''Botan[isch].''</span>" (pastor's leaf, monk's head, sow thistle, a certain herb. ''Botanical.''). The first two names do appear to be common names for Taraxacum officinale and the second name does neatly fit ''caput monachi'', although the third name seems to refer to somewhat similar-looking [[wikipedia:Sonchus|Sonchus]].
::::::So, I agree with ''taraxacum'', which (at least according to Wikipedia, I couldn't find it in Du Cange) entered Latin from Arabic in the 12th century and therefore is not a modern innovation.
::::::Another question is the scope of our entry. In modern English usage ''dandelion'' only refers to the genus Taraxacum and similar plants, such as [[wikipedia:Leontodon|Leontodon]], are known as ''[[wikipedia:False_dandelion|false dandelion]]''. That strikes me as a modern botanical distinction, although I might be biased since my native language simply calls both ''<span lang="de" dir="ltr">Löwenzahn</span>''. [[User:Lūkās|Lūkās]] ([[User talk:Lūkās|talk]]) 01:12, 24 April 2023 (CEST)

== Pudding ==

{{Proposal}}puddinga

{{Reason}}I was think about words like puls dulcis, but pudding is a very universal word that has been adapted in every Romance language. Also Greek does use this word, so I am proposing this word. [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 21:02, 3 March 2023 (CET)

:Looking in the lexicon Morganianum, I found a few words: ''oxygala'', ''erneum'' and ''murtatum''; ''oryzae tympanum/oryza sufflata'' for rice pudding. [[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]] ([[User talk:Logodaedalus|talk]]) 11:49, 4 March 2023 (CET)
::Rice pudding is not the same as pudding, though. In German, we call this "Milchreis", since it has very little in common with pudding. But we can include this word for rice pudding, according to Vicipaedia Rice pudding is "Oryza cum lacte" or "puls oryzae" (but there is no source for that, so we should be cautious). [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 14:36, 4 March 2023 (CET)

== Conjunctor, Adjunctor, Implication, ... ==

{{Proposal}}The latin equivalents

{{Reason}}So, I am currently studying logic and mathematics and there are a bunch of words derived from Latin and Greek. I'd suggest that we should include the latinized versions conjūnctor, adjunctor, implicātiō, ... regardless whether they are attested or not (false friends obviously excluded). There are probably a few hundred words, so I think it'd be better if we do not discuss each one of them, because that would take a lot of time. [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 19:16, 28 March 2023 (CEST)

Acadēmīa:Fabrica

2023-03-03T22:14:41Z

Lūkās: /* Dandelion */ Reply

Acadēmīa:Cūria

2023-02-22T14:16:23Z

Lūkās: /* References */ Reply

{{Forum navigation}}
{| style="margin-top:23px; border:3px solid #c7c7c7; background:#ededed; width:100%; padding:10px; border-spacing: 0;"
|
[[File:Cicerón denuncia a Catilina, por Cesare Maccari.jpg|thumb|Our Acadēmīa in session!]]
{{Header|Purpose}}
:The Curia is the place to discuss the rules and guidelines of the Acadēmīa. Every Academian has the right to submit a proposal. Every Academian has the right to comment on the proposals of others.

:Discussions about individual entries should be held on the respective discussion pages.

:Please put this page on your watch list, so that you may not miss any new proposals.
{{Header|How decisions are made}}
:Decisions made by the Cūria are called '''Acadēmīae consultum'''. These are decided by '''consensus''', i.e. a proposal will automatically be adopted if no objections have come (see ''End of the debate'').
{{Header|How to create a topic}}
* Please look in advance to see if a topic has already been discussed.
* Press "Add topic" above and give your topic a meaningful heading.
* Set <code><nowiki>{{Proposal}}</nowiki></code> at the beginning and then write down your request in detail and precisely.
* Set <code><nowiki>{{Reason}}</nowiki></code> after that and write down your reasoning behind the proposal.
* Click on "Send" and you are done!
{{Header|How to react to a topic}}
* Press "Reply". Set depending on your opinion <code><nowiki>{{Cōnsentiō}}</nowiki></code> or <code><nowiki>{{Dissentiō}}</nowiki></code> at the beginning of your comment and then write down your reasoning.
* Please set <code><nowiki>{{Cōnsentiō}}</nowiki></code> or <code><nowiki>{{Dissentiō}}</nowiki></code> only once. If you change your mind during the debate, you can cross out your comment with <code><nowiki><s>[YOUR COMMENT]</s></nowiki></code> and express your changed opinion again. For documentation purposes, '''do not delete any comment'''!
* If no consensus can be determined with the current proposal, you can set <code><nowiki>{{Compromise}}</nowiki></code> to propose a compromise.
* Otherwise, feel free to discuss with your fellow authors!
{{Header|End of debate}}
:Debates are to be debated for at least seven days. If no objection has been raised in that time, the proposal is adopted. If objections have been raised, the debate continues until all meaningful arguments have been exchanged or all objections have been resolved. In case of doubt, an administrator can decide when the arguments have been exhausted.
:If a proposal is finally not accepted, it does not have to mean that it is over. The debate can be resumed at any time if new arguments arise. Under certain circumstances, the proposal may be put to a vote in the [[Acadēmīa:Comitium|Comitium]].
{{Header|Metadebates}}
: Please discuss all metadebates (i.e. debates concerning these rules written here) on the discussion page [[Acadēmīa talk:Cūria]].
{{Header|Archiving}}
: From time to time the closed discussions are archived for the purpose of overview and moved to a subpage. An administrator will provide a short summary of the discussion, if necessary, so that later readers have an overview.
|-
|}
__NEWSECTIONLINK__

== References ==

I don't know if this is the right forum, but here's the thing. I don't think Wikipedia should be used in the reference section of a word. [[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]] ([[User talk:Logodaedalus|talk]]) 10:22, 21 February 2023 (CET)

:Can you explain your reasoning? One of the purposes of our dictionary is to document language usage. If a word is used in the Latin Wikipedia, it seems worthy of inclusion. At least the Vicipaedia is one of the most comprehensive sites in Latin. [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 13:13, 21 February 2023 (CET)
::What I mean is that we should cite authoritative sources like dictionaries, vocabularies, books et cetera. [[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]] ([[User talk:Logodaedalus|talk]]) 13:24, 21 February 2023 (CET)
:::I think that is a difficult task to limit the work to authoritative dictionaries only. The problem is that the dictionaries are terribly outdated (this is one of the reasons for the Acadēmīa Latīnitātis in the first place). For this very reason, I think it's okay to include words that are already in common use but not yet documented in a dictionary. The Latin Wikipedia is a strong indication that people are using these words. Therefore my opinion to this is: {{Dissentiō}}.
:::I would suggest we wait to see what the others have to say on the matter. Then we can still decide. [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 13:36, 21 February 2023 (CET)
::::I don’t mean only dictionaries but in general latin works like books, articles, poems, written by experts (e.g. Eichenseer, Egger…). [[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]] ([[User talk:Logodaedalus|talk]]) 14:02, 21 February 2023 (CET)
:First of all, I agree that Wikipedia shouldn’t usually be the '''only''' or '''primary''' reference.
:I also agree with @[[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] that the Latin Wikipedia can serve as testament for a word being actively used in modern Latin, although that also depends on the ''maturity'' of an article.
:The Latin Wikipedia has some very good articles accompanied by extensive discussions by knowledgeable Wikipedians about minutiae, but also many very poor ones created by individual, rogue users. There’s also a lot of inconsistency between the terms used by different articles.
:Especially when a term has many variants, Wikipedia’s use can serve as support for preferring one over the others, although we, of course, don’t always have to come to the same conclusions as the Wikipedians.
:So I would opt for allowing references to Wikipedia, but only as additional support for other sources. Exceptions to this rule would have to be discussed and decided on a case by case basis. [[User:Lūkās|Lūkās]] ([[User talk:Lūkās|talk]]) 15:16, 22 February 2023 (CET)

Acadēmīa:Fabrica

2023-02-20T15:28:54Z

Lūkās: /* blogger */ Reply

{{Forum navigation}}
{| style="margin-top:23px; border:3px solid #c7c7c7; background:#ededed; width:100%; padding:10px; border-spacing: 0;"
|
[[File:Vichten Roman Mosaic 20210517 123151 (51184994093).jpg|thumb|Each word should be created as carefully as a mosaic.]]
{{Header|Purpose}}
:This page is used to discuss new entries that are labeled with {{Suggested}}.
:Please put this page on your watch list, so that you may not miss any new proposals.
{{Header|How to create a topic}}
* Please look, if your entry already exists.
* Press "Add topic" above and write down your English word you want in the subject.
* Set <code><nowiki>{{Proposal}}</nowiki></code> at the beginning and then write down your proposal.
* Set <code><nowiki>{{Reason}}</nowiki></code> after that and write down your reasoning behind the proposal. Provide etymology and/or evidence in the Romance languages.
* You can make your own (counter)proposals with <code><nowiki>{{Proposal}}</nowiki></code> that are to be discussed.
* Click on "Send" and you are done!
{{Header|How to react to a topic}}
* Press "Reply". Set depending on your opinion <code><nowiki>{{Cōnsentiō}}</nowiki></code> or <code><nowiki>{{Dissentiō}}</nowiki></code> at the beginning of your comment and then write down your reasoning.
* Please set <code><nowiki>{{Cōnsentiō}}</nowiki></code> or <code><nowiki>{{Dissentiō}}</nowiki></code> only once. If you change your mind during the debate, you can cross out your comment with <code><nowiki><s>[YOUR COMMENT]</s></nowiki></code> and express your changed opinion again. For documentation purposes, '''do not delete any comment'''!
{{Header|End of debate}}
:Debates are to be debated for at least seven days. They may go longer, until all meaningful arguments have been exchanged or all objections have been resolved. If there is consensus, the entry is entered with the proposed word. If there are several words for which there is consensus, several words can be put in the entry.
{{Header|Archiving}}
: From time to time the closed discussions are archived for the purpose of overview and moved to a subpage. An administrator will provide a short summary of the discussion, if necessary, so that later readers have an overview.
|-
|}
__NEWSECTIONLINK__

== blogger ==

{{Proposal}}histologista

{{Reason}}As discussed on [[Talk:blog]] with @[[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]], ''histologista'' seems to be a very good choice. I would suggest, we should also add ''blogista'' in analogy to blōx. My only problem with using histologista/histologion would be that most people don't understand this world immediately. [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 11:10, 18 February 2023 (CET)

:Thank you! I think that immediate understanding of a word is a secundary problem. The priority in my opinion is to use words with good roots. [[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]] ([[User talk:Logodaedalus|talk]]) 12:31, 18 February 2023 (CET)
::I am also thinking about blōgista as an alternative. This fits to our suggestion [[blōx]] which is in my opinion a bit more intuitive. Any opinion to this? [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 13:24, 18 February 2023 (CET)
:::May I suggest ''blōgifex''? [[User:Lūkās|Lūkās]] ([[User talk:Lūkās|talk]]) 15:09, 20 February 2023 (CET)
::::The analogy to words like ''artifex'' or ''opifex'' is immediately clear. However, I am not sure if it fits. With the suffix -fex (<facere) the craftsmanship is in the foreground, but does the management of a blog fall under craftmanship? [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 15:20, 20 February 2023 (CET)
:::::Well, I would argue the act of blogging includes more craftsmanship than the work of a ''pontifex''. There also appears to be Middle Latin ''sortifex'' (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sortifex#Latin), which has no connection to craftsmanship whatsoever, and New Latin already seems to have appropriated ''retifex'' (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/retifex#Latin) for a networker.
:::::And isn't any skilful blogger to some degree a wordsmith? [[User:Lūkās|Lūkās]] ([[User talk:Lūkās|talk]]) 16:28, 20 February 2023 (CET)

== Czechia ==

{{Proposal}}Bohēmia or Cechia

{{Reason}}That is a matter that I am still not sure how we are going to deal with. Some find "Czechia" problematic as a spelling and prefer Cechia (see the discussion on [https://www.reddit.com/r/latin/comments/115go1o/i_have_created_an_englishneolatin_dictionary/ Reddit]). I would also want to suggest taking that as an alternative. However, there are also those who prefer the name Bohēmia, although Bohemia is only a part of today's Czechia and had also included Germans, for example. Therefore, I want to hear your opinion on whether we should list Bohemia as an alternative vocabulary with the indication that it is actually misleading. So what is your opinion on this? [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 14:02, 20 February 2023 (CET)

:In that regard, ''Czechia'' ultimately has the same issues as ''Bohemia'', as it derives from the Czech name for Bohemia, ''Čechy''; it is a pars pro toto either way. So I don’t see any harm in giving ''Bohemia'' as an alternative.
:Vicipaedia’s main source for ''Cechia'' is modern (1997), the older sources given there use ''Čechia'' (note that ''č'' in Czech orthography replaced earlier ''cz'', which Polish retained) or ''Czechia''. Vicipaedia itself also later gives ''Czechia'' as the oldest spelling. So, I don’t really see precedent for ''Cechia'' beyond modern innovation.
:While Hofmannus (1677) obviously couldn’t refer to the modern country, he supports the spelling ''Czechia'' under "''Boëmia'', vel ''Bohemia'', vel ''Bœhemia''": "Ejectis tandem è Boiohemo etiam Marcomannis Quadisque Sclavini Scythica & Barbara gens duce Czecho, intraverunt, Anno 550. quos ab occupato Boiohemo vulgus ''Bohemos'' vocat."
:By the way, given the etymology (''Boio'' -> ''Bo''), are you sure it’s ''Bohēmia'' and not ''Bōhēmia'' or even ''Bōhemia''? Although, as Greek uses ''Βοημία'', ''Bohēmia'' does appear correct. [[User:Lūkās|Lūkās]] ([[User talk:Lūkās|talk]]) 15:03, 20 February 2023 (CET)
::According to [[wikt:Bohemia#Latin|Wiktionary]] it is Bohēmia, although the alternative Boihaemum with long diphtongs does exist. It is still a problem for me, because Czechia is undoubtly the nation state of Czechs, whereas Bohemia denotes the feudal state. I think we can list both variants, but push Czechia further up. I also think we should add an option to the templates so that the IPA rendering is correct. [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 15:15, 20 February 2023 (CET)
:::I concur, ''Czechia'' should be the main entry, ''Bohēmia'' should be given as a secondary option.
:::Regarding ''Czechia'': I am aware that the pronunciations are auto-generated and cannot, at the moment, be changed or removed individually. Nonetheless, the given pronunciations for ''Czechia'' appear to be incorrect (and hardly pronounceable):
:::(Classical) IPA(key): /ˈkze.kʰi.a/, [ˈkd̪͡z̪ɛkʰiä]
:::(Ecclesiastical) IPA(key): /ˈkd͡ze.ki.a/, [ˈkd̪͡z̪ɛːkiä]
:::While any classical pronunciation is obviously hypothetical, <cz> was evidently meant to transcribe a Slavic sound that could not be represented accurately otherwise within the German traditional pronunciation of Latin. ''Czechia'' is not an isolated use of that spelling. Other examples I could find at Hofmannus include ''czar'' (tsar), ''Czernobela'' (Chernobyl) and ''Czenstochova'' (Polish Częstochowa, German Czenstochau/Tschenstochau). In the latter two, as well as ''Czechia'', it appears to represent /t͡ʃ/ or /t͡ʂ/, in ''czar'' it appears to correspond to /t͡s/.
:::While common sense makes for a weak argument and I lack hard evidence for this (since ecclesiastical pronunciation isn't well-defined in this regard), I would expect ecclesiastical Latin to, in practice, use /t͡ʃ/ in this case. It is a phoneme that is already used in ecclesiastical Latin and it corresponds to the original intention.
:::As for classical pronunciation, I am at a loss. Since it is entirely hypothetical, I would suggest to either give none or to opt for a reasonable approximation and append it with an asterisk. [[User:Lūkās|Lūkās]] ([[User talk:Lūkās|talk]]) 16:18, 20 February 2023 (CET)

Acadēmīa:Fabrica

2023-02-20T15:18:43Z

Lūkās: /* Czechia */ Reply

{{Forum navigation}}
{| style="margin-top:23px; border:3px solid #c7c7c7; background:#ededed; width:100%; padding:10px; border-spacing: 0;"
|
[[File:Vichten Roman Mosaic 20210517 123151 (51184994093).jpg|thumb|Each word should be created as carefully as a mosaic.]]
{{Header|Purpose}}
:This page is used to discuss new entries that are labeled with {{Suggested}}.
:Please put this page on your watch list, so that you may not miss any new proposals.
{{Header|How to create a topic}}
* Please look, if your entry already exists.
* Press "Add topic" above and write down your English word you want in the subject.
* Set <code><nowiki>{{Proposal}}</nowiki></code> at the beginning and then write down your proposal.
* Set <code><nowiki>{{Reason}}</nowiki></code> after that and write down your reasoning behind the proposal. Provide etymology and/or evidence in the Romance languages.
* You can make your own (counter)proposals with <code><nowiki>{{Proposal}}</nowiki></code> that are to be discussed.
* Click on "Send" and you are done!
{{Header|How to react to a topic}}
* Press "Reply". Set depending on your opinion <code><nowiki>{{Cōnsentiō}}</nowiki></code> or <code><nowiki>{{Dissentiō}}</nowiki></code> at the beginning of your comment and then write down your reasoning.
* Please set <code><nowiki>{{Cōnsentiō}}</nowiki></code> or <code><nowiki>{{Dissentiō}}</nowiki></code> only once. If you change your mind during the debate, you can cross out your comment with <code><nowiki><s>[YOUR COMMENT]</s></nowiki></code> and express your changed opinion again. For documentation purposes, '''do not delete any comment'''!
{{Header|End of debate}}
:Debates are to be debated for at least seven days. They may go longer, until all meaningful arguments have been exchanged or all objections have been resolved. If there is consensus, the entry is entered with the proposed word. If there are several words for which there is consensus, several words can be put in the entry.
{{Header|Archiving}}
: From time to time the closed discussions are archived for the purpose of overview and moved to a subpage. An administrator will provide a short summary of the discussion, if necessary, so that later readers have an overview.
|-
|}
__NEWSECTIONLINK__

== blogger ==

{{Proposal}}histologista

{{Reason}}As discussed on [[Talk:blog]] with @[[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]], ''histologista'' seems to be a very good choice. I would suggest, we should also add ''blogista'' in analogy to blōx. My only problem with using histologista/histologion would be that most people don't understand this world immediately. [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 11:10, 18 February 2023 (CET)

:Thank you! I think that immediate understanding of a word is a secundary problem. The priority in my opinion is to use words with good roots. [[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]] ([[User talk:Logodaedalus|talk]]) 12:31, 18 February 2023 (CET)
::I am also thinking about blōgista as an alternative. This fits to our suggestion [[blōx]] which is in my opinion a bit more intuitive. Any opinion to this? [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 13:24, 18 February 2023 (CET)
:::May I suggest ''blōgifex''? [[User:Lūkās|Lūkās]] ([[User talk:Lūkās|talk]]) 15:09, 20 February 2023 (CET)
::::The analogy to words like ''artifex'' or ''opifex'' is immediately clear. However, I am not sure if it fits. With the suffix -fex (<facere) the craftsmanship is in the foreground, but does the management of a blog fall under craftmanship? [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 15:20, 20 February 2023 (CET)

== Czechia ==

{{Proposal}}Bohēmia or Cechia

{{Reason}}That is a matter that I am still not sure how we are going to deal with. Some find "Czechia" problematic as a spelling and prefer Cechia (see the discussion on [https://www.reddit.com/r/latin/comments/115go1o/i_have_created_an_englishneolatin_dictionary/ Reddit]). I would also want to suggest taking that as an alternative. However, there are also those who prefer the name Bohēmia, although Bohemia is only a part of today's Czechia and had also included Germans, for example. Therefore, I want to hear your opinion on whether we should list Bohemia as an alternative vocabulary with the indication that it is actually misleading. So what is your opinion on this? [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 14:02, 20 February 2023 (CET)

:In that regard, ''Czechia'' ultimately has the same issues as ''Bohemia'', as it derives from the Czech name for Bohemia, ''Čechy''; it is a pars pro toto either way. So I don’t see any harm in giving ''Bohemia'' as an alternative.
:Vicipaedia’s main source for ''Cechia'' is modern (1997), the older sources given there use ''Čechia'' (note that ''č'' in Czech orthography replaced earlier ''cz'', which Polish retained) or ''Czechia''. Vicipaedia itself also later gives ''Czechia'' as the oldest spelling. So, I don’t really see precedent for ''Cechia'' beyond modern innovation.
:While Hofmannus (1677) obviously couldn’t refer to the modern country, he supports the spelling ''Czechia'' under "''Boëmia'', vel ''Bohemia'', vel ''Bœhemia''": "Ejectis tandem è Boiohemo etiam Marcomannis Quadisque Sclavini Scythica & Barbara gens duce Czecho, intraverunt, Anno 550. quos ab occupato Boiohemo vulgus ''Bohemos'' vocat."
:By the way, given the etymology (''Boio'' -> ''Bo''), are you sure it’s ''Bohēmia'' and not ''Bōhēmia'' or even ''Bōhemia''? Although, as Greek uses ''Βοημία'', ''Bohēmia'' does appear correct. [[User:Lūkās|Lūkās]] ([[User talk:Lūkās|talk]]) 15:03, 20 February 2023 (CET)
::According to [[wikt:Bohemia#Latin|Wiktionary]] it is Bohēmia, although the alternative Boihaemum with long diphtongs does exist. It is still a problem for me, because Czechia is undoubtly the nation state of Czechs, whereas Bohemia denotes the feudal state. I think we can list both variants, but push Czechia further up. I also think we should add an option to the templates so that the IPA rendering is correct. [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 15:15, 20 February 2023 (CET)
:::I concur, ''Czechia'' should be the main entry, ''Bohēmia'' should be given as a secondary option.
:::Regarding ''Czechia'': I am aware that the pronunciations are auto-generated and cannot, at the moment, be changed or removed individually. Nonetheless, the given pronunciations for ''Czechia'' appear to be incorrect (and hardly pronounceable):
:::(Classical) IPA(key): /ˈkze.kʰi.a/, [ˈkd̪͡z̪ɛkʰiä]
:::(Ecclesiastical) IPA(key): /ˈkd͡ze.ki.a/, [ˈkd̪͡z̪ɛːkiä]
:::While any classical pronunciation is obviously hypothetical, <cz> was evidently meant to transcribe a Slavic sound that could not be represented accurately otherwise within the German traditional pronunciation of Latin. ''Czechia'' is not an isolated use of that spelling. Other examples I could find at Hofmannus include ''czar'' (tsar), ''Czernobela'' (Chernobyl) and ''Czenstochova'' (Polish Częstochowa, German Czenstochau/Tschenstochau). In the latter two, as well as ''Czechia'', it appears to represent /t͡ʃ/ or /t͡ʂ/, in ''czar'' it appears to correspond to /t͡s/.
:::While common sense makes for a weak argument and I lack hard evidence for this (since ecclesiastical pronunciation isn't well-defined in this regard), I would expect ecclesiastical Latin to, in practice, use /t͡ʃ/ in this case. It is a phoneme that is already used in ecclesiastical Latin and it corresponds to the original intention.
:::As for classical pronunciation, I am at a loss. Since it is entirely hypothetical, I would suggest to either give none or to opt for a reasonable approximation and append it with an asterisk. [[User:Lūkās|Lūkās]] ([[User talk:Lūkās|talk]]) 16:18, 20 February 2023 (CET)

Acadēmīa:Fabrica

2023-02-20T14:09:47Z

Lūkās: /* blogger */ Reply

Acadēmīa:Fabrica

2023-02-20T14:03:54Z

Lūkās: /* Czechia */ Reply

cryptocurrency

2023-02-14T20:55:34Z

Lūkās: /* Digital currency based on a cryptographic system */

== Digital currency based on a cryptographic system ==

{{Noun
|Entry = cryptonomisma
|Genetive = cryptonomismatis
|Gender = n
|Meaning = cryptocurrency
|Stem = cryptonomismat
|Declension = 3n
|Alternative forms =
|Derived terms =
|Etymology = :From Greek ''κρυπτονόμισμα''.
|Quotes =
|Note =
|References =
* {{R:WT-EN|cryptocurrency|14.02.2023}}
* {{R:L&S|nomisma}}
}}

{{Noun
|Entry = cryptomonēta
|Genetive = cryptomonētae
|Gender = f
|Meaning = cryptocurrency
|Stem = cryptomonēt
|Declension = 1
|Alternative forms =
|Derived terms =
|Etymology =
* Coined by analogy to several Romance languages.
:From ''crypto-'' + ''monēta''
|Quotes =
|Note =
|References =
* {{R:WT-EN|cryptocurrency|14.02.2023}}
* {{R:WT-EN|criptomoeda|14.02.2023}}
* {{R:WT-EN|criptomoneda|14.02.2023}}
* {{R:L&S|moneta}}
}}

[[Category:English noun]] [[Category:Internet]]

cryptocurrency

2023-02-14T20:54:34Z

Lūkās: /* Digital currency based on a cryptographic system */

== Digital currency based on a cryptographic system ==

{{Noun
|Entry = cryptonomisma
|Genetive = cryptonomismatis
|Gender = n
|Meaning = cryptocurrency
|Stem = cryptonomismat
|Declension = 3n
|Alternative forms =
|Derived terms =
|Etymology = :From Greek ''κρυπτονόμισμα''.
|Quotes =
|Note =
|References =
* {{R:WT-EN|cryptocurrency|14.02.2023}}
* {{R:L&S|nomisma}}
}}

{{Noun
|Entry = cryptomonēta
|Genetive = cryptomonētae
|Gender = f
|Meaning = cryptocurrency
|Stem = cryptomonēt
|Declension = 1
|Alternative forms =
|Derived terms =
|Etymology =
* Coined by analogy to several Romance languages.
:From ''crypto-'' + ''monēta''
|Quotes =
|Note =
|References =
* {{R:WT-EN|cryptomonnaie|14.02.2023}}
* {{R:WT-EN|criptomoeda|14.02.2023}}
* {{R:WT-EN|criptomoneda|14.02.2023}}
* {{R:L&S|moneta}}
}}

[[Category:English noun]] [[Category:Internet]]

cryptocurrency

2023-02-14T20:53:01Z

Lūkās: /* Digital currency based on a cryptographic system */

== Digital currency based on a cryptographic system ==

{{Noun
|Entry = cryptonomisma
|Genetive = cryptonomismatis
|Gender = n
|Meaning = cryptocurrency
|Stem = cryptonomismat
|Declension = 3n
|Alternative forms =
|Derived terms =
|Etymology = :From Greek ''κρυπτονόμισμα''.
|Quotes =
|Note =
|References =
* {{R:WT-EN|cryptocurrency|14.02.2023}}
* {{R:L&S|nomisma}}
}}

{{Noun
|Entry = cryptomonēta
|Genetive = cryptomonētae
|Gender = f
|Meaning = cryptocurrency
|Stem = cryptomonēt
|Declension = 1
|Alternative forms =
|Derived terms =
|Etymology =
* Coined by analogy to several Romance languages.
:From ''crypto-'' + ''monēta''
|Quotes =
|Note =
|References =
* {{R:WT-EN|cryptomonnaie|14.02.2023}}
* {{R:WT-EN|cryptomoeda|14.02.2023}}
* {{R:WT-EN|cryptomoneda|14.02.2023}}
* {{R:L&S|moneta}}
}}

[[Category:English noun]] [[Category:Internet]]

cryptocurrency

2023-02-14T20:42:04Z

Lūkās: Created page with "== Digital currency based on a cryptographic system == {{Noun |Entry = cryptonomisma |Genetive = cryptonomismatis |Gender = n |Meaning = cryptocurrency |Stem = cryptonomismat |Declension = 3n |Alternative forms = |Derived terms = |Etymology = :From Greek ''κρυπτονόμισμα''. |Quotes = |Note = |References = }} {{Noun |Entry = cryptomonēta |Genetive = cryptomonētae |Gender = f |Meaning = cryptocurrency |Stem = cryptomonēt |Declension = 1 |Alternative forms..."

== Digital currency based on a cryptographic system ==

{{Noun
|Entry = cryptonomisma
|Genetive = cryptonomismatis
|Gender = n
|Meaning = cryptocurrency
|Stem = cryptonomismat
|Declension = 3n
|Alternative forms =
|Derived terms =
|Etymology = :From Greek ''κρυπτονόμισμα''.
|Quotes =
|Note =
|References =
}}

{{Noun
|Entry = cryptomonēta
|Genetive = cryptomonētae
|Gender = f
|Meaning = cryptocurrency
|Stem = cryptomonēt
|Declension = 1
|Alternative forms =
|Derived terms =
|Etymology =
* Coined by analogy to several Romance languages.
:From ''crypto-'' + ''monēta''
|Quotes =
|Note =
|References =
}}

[[Category:English noun]] [[Category:Internet]]

Acadēmīa:Popīna

2023-01-22T12:05:00Z

Lūkās: /* First topic! */ Reply

{{Forum navigation}}
{| style="margin-top:23px; border:3px solid #c7c7c7; background:#ededed; width:100%; padding:10px; border-spacing: 0;"
|
[[File:House of Julia Felix still life wine and fruit.jpg|thumb|Sit down and relax.]]
{{Header|Purpose}}
:The '''Popīna''' is just a place to talk about stuff that does not fit into the wiki or is not related to it.
{{Header|How to add a topic}}
* Press "Add Section" in the upper right corner and give your topic a meaningful heading.
* Write your comment.
* Click on "Send" and you are done!
{{Header|Rules}}
* Be civil.
* Do not write anything that may violate our netiquette.
{{Header|Archiving}}
: From time to time the talks are archived for the purpose of overview and moved to a subpage.
|-
|}
__NEWSECTIONLINK__

== First topic! ==

This is the first topic every written on Acadēmīa! Rejoice and behold its beauty. Nunc est bibendum! [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 12:44, 22 January 2023 (CET)

:Gaudeamus igitur! [[User:Lūkās|Lūkās]] ([[User talk:Lūkās|talk]]) 13:05, 22 January 2023 (CET)

fuck

2023-01-17T20:50:07Z

Lūkās: Created page with "== to penetrate someone's vagina with one's penis == {{Verb |Entry = futuere |Present stem = futu |Perfect stem = futu |Supine stem = futūt |Conjugation = 3 |Meaning = * to fuck; to be the penetrative partner in vaginal intercourse |Alternative forms = |Derived terms = |Etymology = |Quotes = |Note = |References = }} == to penetrate someone's anus with one's penis == {{Verb |Entry = pēdīcāre |Present stem = pēdīc |Perfect stem = pēdīcāv |Supine stem = pēdīc..."

== to penetrate someone's vagina with one's penis ==

{{Verb
|Entry = futuere
|Present stem = futu
|Perfect stem = futu
|Supine stem = futūt
|Conjugation = 3
|Meaning =
* to fuck; to be the penetrative partner in vaginal intercourse
|Alternative forms =
|Derived terms =
|Etymology =
|Quotes =
|Note =
|References =
}}

== to penetrate someone's anus with one's penis ==

{{Verb
|Entry = pēdīcāre
|Present stem = pēdīc
|Perfect stem = pēdīcāv
|Supine stem = pēdīcāt
|Conjugation = 1
|Meaning =
* to fuck; to be the penetrative partner in anal intercourse
|Alternative forms = paedīcāre
|Derived terms =
|Etymology =
|Quotes =
|Note =
|References =
}}

== to penetrate someone's mouth with one's penis ==

{{Verb
|Entry = irrumāre
|Present stem = irrum
|Perfect stem = irrumāv
|Supine stem = irrumāt
|Conjugation = 1
|Meaning =
* to facefuck; to be the penetrative partner in oral intercourse
|Alternative forms =
|Derived terms =
|Etymology =
|Quotes =
|Note =
|References =
}}

== to have one's vagina penetrated by someone's penis ==

{{Verb
|Entry = crīsāre
|Present stem = crīs
|Perfect stem = crīsāv
|Supine stem = crīsāt
|Conjugation = 1
|Meaning =
* to fuck; to be the receptive partner in vaginal intercourse
|Alternative forms = crissāre
|Derived terms =
|Etymology =
|Quotes =
|Note =
|References =
}}

== to have one's anus penetrated by someone's penis ==

{{Verb
|Entry = cēvēre
|Present stem = cēv
|Perfect stem = cēv
|Supine stem =
|Conjugation = 2
|Meaning =
* to bottom; to be the receptive partner in anal intercourse
|Alternative forms =
|Derived terms =
|Etymology =
|Quotes =
|Note = No passive forms and no supine
|References =
}}

== to have one's mouth penetrated by someone's penis ==

{{Verb
|Entry = fellāre
|Present stem = fell
|Perfect stem = fellāv
|Supine stem = fellāt
|Conjugation = 1
|Meaning =
* to give a blowjob; to be the receptive partner in oral intercourse
|Alternative forms =
|Derived terms =
|Etymology =
|Quotes =
|Note =
|References =
}}