Acadēmīa:Fabrica: Difference between revisions
(→blogger: new section) |
Logodaedalus (talk | contribs) (→blogger: Reply) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
{{Reason}}As discussed on [[Talk:blog]] with @[[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]], ''histologista'' seems to be a very good choice. I would suggest, we should also add ''blogista'' in analogy to blōx. My only problem with using histologista/histologion would be that most people don't understand this world immediately. [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 11:10, 18 February 2023 (CET) | {{Reason}}As discussed on [[Talk:blog]] with @[[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]], ''histologista'' seems to be a very good choice. I would suggest, we should also add ''blogista'' in analogy to blōx. My only problem with using histologista/histologion would be that most people don't understand this world immediately. [[User:Jācōbus|Jācōbus]] ([[User talk:Jācōbus|talk]]) 11:10, 18 February 2023 (CET) | ||
:Thank you! I think that immediate understanding of a word is a secundary problem. The priority in my opinion is to use words with good roots. [[User:Logodaedalus|Logodaedalus]] ([[User talk:Logodaedalus|talk]]) 12:31, 18 February 2023 (CET) |
Revision as of 12:31, 18 February 2023
Purpose:
How to create a topic:
How to react to a topic:
End of debate:
Archiving:
|
blogger
Proposal: histologista
Reason: As discussed on Talk:blog with @Logodaedalus, histologista seems to be a very good choice. I would suggest, we should also add blogista in analogy to blōx. My only problem with using histologista/histologion would be that most people don't understand this world immediately. Jācōbus (talk) 11:10, 18 February 2023 (CET)
- Thank you! I think that immediate understanding of a word is a secundary problem. The priority in my opinion is to use words with good roots. Logodaedalus (talk) 12:31, 18 February 2023 (CET)